Nearly 60 years after Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court is still debating what counts as a reasonable expectation of ...

The Fourth Amendment protects a user’s “location history,” the Supreme Court ruled Monday. The same logic already applied to ...

In its first digital-privacy case since 2018, the court builds on a privacy precedent it set then.

Your cellphone continuously creates a durable and revealing digital trail that law enforcement can obtain with a warrant.

Law enforcement officials frequently draw virtual fences around areas of interest and require Google to identify every ...

But only five justices voted to invalidate the order on constitutional grounds. The other four indicated varying degrees of ...

The nine proposed amendments to Orange's charter that the village's Charter Review Commission has recommended will be on the ...

On Monday in Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court held that government-ordered analysis of data collected via Google's ...

The Supreme Court ruled Monday in Chatrie v. United States that when law enforcement used a geofence warrant — directing Google to produce location data for every cellphone near a Virginia bank during ...

Law enforcement’s use of warrants sweeping smartphone location data requires privacy protections, court rules ...

Updated on June 29 at 3:50 p.m. The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that when law enforcement officials used a “geofence ...

The Supreme Court ruled that police conduct a Fourth Amendment search when they obtain a person’s detailed cellphone location ...